- NEWS FEATURE
ChatGPT broke the Turing test — the race is on for new ways to assess AI
Illustration by The Project Twins
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Nature 619, 686-689 (2023)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02361-7
References
Moskvichev, A., Odouard, V. V. & Mitchell, M. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07141 (2023).
Turing, A. M. Mind LIX, 433–460 (1950).
Jannai, D., Meron, A., Lenz, B., Levine, Y. & Shoham, Y. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.20010 (2023).
OpenAI. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774 (2023).
Bubeck, S. et al. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712 (2023).
Chollet, F. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547 (2019).
Johnson, A., Vong, W. K., Lake, B. M. & Gureckis, T. M. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.05823 (2021).
Xu, Y., Li, W., Vaezipoor, P., Sanner. S. & Khalil, E. B. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18354 (2023).
Li, K. et al. Proc. Eleventh Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. https://openreview.net/forum?id=DeG07_TcZvT (2023).
ChatGPT is a black box: how AI research can break it open
In AI, is bigger always better?
What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science
ChatGPT: five priorities for research
